Discussion about this post

User's avatar
K Andrew Serum's avatar

I think one underappreciated motivation for restricting risky play is the very real financial or legal consequences.

My parents are boomers, and if they fell off a tree branch and broke their arm, their parents would take them to a family doctor who might even set the bone and put the arm in a plaster cast on the spot for a reasonable sum. If my kids break an arm, it's automatically a minimum $6,000 emergency room visit with the potential for up to $12,000 out of pocket maximum.

During the pandemic, many states have started prosecuting parents for failing to keep kids on a short leash, including the state in which I live. I feel certain that if I let my kids wander the community spaces in our neighborhood unsupervised, more than one of my neighbors would contact law enforcement to report an unattended child.

I'm all in on this analysis, but many of the factors affecting this huge problem are way beyond the ability of any individual parent to solve.

Expand full comment
Nicholas.Wilkinson's avatar

Could having fewer children be one factor? Apart from fewer opportunities to play with siblings, it's a cliché that we are blasé about our second child doing things that we'd have freaked out over with our first. About third and fourth children, I can't speak.

Expand full comment
104 more comments...

No posts