9 Comments
User's avatar
TriTorch's avatar

Stress caused by whom? Oh right, the media+government+WEF:

New Normal ● Alone Together ● Build Back Better ● Flatten the Curve

Stay Home Save Lives ● Protect/Save the NHS ● We’re all in this together

Test, Trace, Treat ● Stay smart, Stay Safe, Stay Open ● We Stay Home!

Don’t Panic, Don’t Rush, Don’t Overstock ● Only You Can Prevent the Spread

Stay Home, Your Home is Your Lifeline ● Stay Home, Save Lives, Avoid Stage 5

NHS: We Stay At Work for You – You Stay At Home For Us ● COVID Ends With You

Follow The Science ● Trust The Science ● Believe In The Science

Be Informed, Be Prepared, Be Smart, Be Safe: Be Ready to Fight COVID-19

Don't do your own research ● We're your one source for truth ● Ask your doctor

The vaccine will save us ● The booster will save us ● The 4th dose is the answer

Your freedom ends where your contagion begins ● Self Isolate!

I wear my mask to protect you and you wear your mask to protect me

There is no evidence of harm ● This is a pandemic of the un-vaccinated

Out of an abundance of caution ● No one is safe until everyone is safe

This is for the greater good ● It is Safe and Effective ● The science is settled

THE SCIENCE IS YOUR NEW GOD AND IT IS WHAT WE SAY IT IS

These are not science terms and phrases. They are hypnotic chants meant to induce an audience into a suggestive state of mind – this is why they are repeated over and over and over again.

Furthermore, masking has historically been an integral part of an initiation ritual: in our case the initiation into the “new normal” the globalists have planned for us.

Put another way—all of this was one giant world-wide psychological operation. Here is a collection of authorities admitting this with its horrible effects woven through them. Take the time to read through this–the crimes are horrible. But first, to put these horrors into context, COVID-19 posed practically no risk to anyone, and yet we were blitzed with fearmongering at every turn: https://tritorch.com/covidhypnosis

Expand full comment
PowerCorrupts's avatar

u:" It is crucial to remember that these are modifiable problems"

me:" It is crucial to remember that these modifiable problems are NOT RECOGNIZED AS modifiable"...

...esp... denial of science of human flaws, etc

Expand full comment
Roman S Shapoval's avatar

The best way we can beat the trend is by swimming upstream, not looking at screens first thing in the morning, and marching our children and ourselves out for that Sunrise. Then watch the stats swing back in our favor.

Expand full comment
Mariska Burger's avatar

That would be the ideal.🙏🏼

Expand full comment
jesse porter's avatar

I'm not anti-science, but I am deeply skeptical of scientists, as of all humans, especially those who wield power over others. As TriTorch said below, "THE SCIENCE IS YOUR NEW GOD AND IT IS WHAT WE SAY IT IS." Scientists are the new priesthood and are equally corrupt as were and are all the other priests. Yes, power always tends to corrupt.

A very high percent of scientific study is funded by government, so there is no economic constraint to funding. Also, there is no purely private investing. What comes from industry is from industries deeply imbedded with government, feasting at the public trough. The purse-strings that control funding are pulled in academia and all decisions are political. Some of the most tyrannical people in the world are academics. No power is allowed below department heads, and most of the work done is by the most powerless--students. Both what is studied and how it is studied is tightly controlled department chairs.

Sociology, psychology, psychiatry, and medicine are the least scientific of all academic fields of study. All of them rely heavily on statistics, the most malleable tool in mathematics, which is why it is extensively used in politics. There is no difference between scientific studies and political polling. Practitioners are very aware that any desired outcomes can and do result from question engineering and respondent selection. For each study, the questioners are thoroughly trained to ask questions to elicit the desired results. Department chairs are no less manipulative that political pollsters.

Lawyers use the same "science" to design their prosecution and defense strategies, and laws are written with that in mind. It is why precedent is so effective. It is also why movies' and plays' plots and dialogue are so repetitive. It's not science, it's poor players strutting and fretting their hour on the stage.

The destruction of families is by design. And the hand-wringing about it insane. "These socioeconomic disparities affect access to supportive social environments, ultimately impacting adolescent health outcomes. The report calls for policy interventions to address these disparities and ensure all young people have the opportunity to thrive" from the HBSC study is insanity. Why are "greater school stress and lower teacher support" concerns when school programs are designed for family destruction, the real problem. The Brave New World is scientifically designed by socio- and psycho-paths to replace the family with the state.

And the designers know that the vacuum resulting from the destruction of the family will be filled with psychiatric and social disorders requiring more institutional "remedies." Science! Schmience!

Expand full comment
Blanch Ann's avatar

I have to think that reconnecting with purpose plays a role here. I think some of these adolescents (most?) are asking deep existential, questions about purpose and meaning. And so many aren’t finding hopeful answers.

When one has a clear understanding of your purpose, gifts, and passion — shoot, even a murky understanding, or at least an acknowledgment that you can begin to identify these things, it is easier to roll over the bumps that come, I think.

Victor Frankl’s book comes to mind. Also, maybe a deeper dive into Faith communities, both to explore answers to the purpose question and for the supportive community and connection.

Expand full comment
Jim Klaas's avatar

What happened to the US data in the last set of graphs? Looks like it ends 2010.

Expand full comment
Zach Rausch's avatar

The HBSC stopped collecting data in the U.S. in 2010. I don't know why.. It's unfortunate

Expand full comment
𝓙𝓪𝓼𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓮 𝓦𝓸𝓵𝓯𝓮's avatar

I'm going to blame capitalism.

Expand full comment